[Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
Rachel Hiatt
rachel_hiatt at sfcta.org
Wed Jul 27 15:48:09 MDT 2005
- Find out where the project is in the approval process
- Find out who at the Planning Dept is managing the
environmental review. I don't know how easy it is for a member of the
public to find out these things.
- Find out what transportation mitigations are being
considered. The Home Depot project surely had to complete a
transportation analysis as part of any EIR preparations. I don't know
how easy it is for a member of the public to get an audience with the
environmental review staff regarding a specific project... probably not
easy. But one should be able to find out whether a draft transportation
analysis is available for review. If so, get it, and comment on it.
- Does MTA / DPT/ MUNI have liaisons with the Planning Dept
environmental review folks? The logical thing is for the environmental
review person to contact MTA to find out what projects should be funded
by Home Depot as mitigations. But maybe things don't work that way
right now... MTA could provide official comments on the transportation
analysis, though doing so is probably not the standard practice...
- Members of public should request at each available public
comment opportunity that the said projects be included and funded by
Home Depot. Staff of MTA should try to work with the environmental
review staff to have needed projects included as transportation
mitigations where relevant. That's how it seems to me, anyway...
This is the kind of thing that, in my opinion, MUST be funded by home
depot and it is just criminal for Home Depot to get away with not
funding it.
_____
From: Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org
[mailto:Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Sallaberry
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:19 PM
To: Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
Subject: RE: RE: [Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd
bikeway
I don't know...slide some big cheese a few c-notes? Where is this
project in the approval process? I'll leave it to someone more in tune
with the Home Depot project. I can certainly help with the design if
this additional work is accepted by Home Depot.
If Home Depot doesn't do it, DPT will be looking at it this year. It
will just take longer and we'll need to find money for the work
(because, you know, the DPT Bicycle Program gets $0 from the city).
At the very very absolute least, Home Depot should be convinced to
support these sorts of changes when they are eventually designed and
proposed by DPT, regardless of impacts to on-street parking near their
store.
Dave Snyder <dave at livablecity.org>
07/27/2005 01:44 PM
To
Mike Sallaberry <Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org>,
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
cc
Subject
RE: RE: [Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
Mike,
These are great ideas. What will it take to get them seriously included
in the discussion of mitigations for the Home Depot project?
Dave
I think we should be careful to not oversimplify the details associated
with constructing segregated BRT facilities in the middle of the roadway
if such a request is to be taken seriously by Home Depot.
Another idea: A commute hour parking tow-away that reveals transit lane
along the curb. If the lane is 14 feet wide, bikes and buses can share
the lane side by side when parking is not allowed. When parking (which
takes 7' - 8') is allowed, the 6' - 7' that remains of the transit lane
can serve as a pseudo bike lane. Actually, I think that may be the best
of both worlds. Relatively simple roadway work, space for cyclists
24/7, transit lane during times when traffic is the worst, and an
overall improvement to capacity along the roadway. Biggest (only?)
loser are the people who park on the street during commute hours.
Throw in some transit priority at the signals, improve some bus stops,
and you have a quick and important improvement for transit and cyclists.
No major, costly, lengthy construction or community outreach that would
likely be associated with a full BRT design (which I believe does not
have to go in now, especially if the space is reserved via a shorter
term proposal like I describe), and the space is partially reserved for
a future effort.
Overall, I think that if we want Home Depot to add roadway improvements
to its scope of work, they have to be fairly cheap, popular, and
relatively quick to implement so that the timing jives with the store
opening.
Also, I know Level of Service is a dirty word to many people here, but
it is a reality that developers have to deal with. The idea I describe
for the curbside transit/bike lane improves LOS during commute hours
than if they went with the current roadway design. That may be very
important to Home Depot.
We may want to be careful to keep requests/demands realistic, or risk
missing an opportunity and end up with nothing.
Mike
"Andrew Sullivan" <sulli at sulli.org>
07/27/2005 12:34 PM
Please respond to
andrew at sulli.org
To
Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org, Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
cc
transit1 at rescuemuni.org
Subject
RE: RE: [Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
Paint's cheap. Concrete boarding islands aren't that expensive. Why
not propose a combination of center bus only lanes and bike lanes?
Sure, this means less auto capacity, but there's a freeway right there.
Auto parking along the side of the street can go, if that's the tradeoff
- most businesses along Bayshore have their own parking, and Home Depot
certainly will.
If we don't get at least the right-of-way for BRT now, we'll never get
it.
Andrew
------- Original Message -------
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:11:00 -0700 Mike Sallaberry wrote:Couple thoughts
off the top of my head:
1) The median work for bike lanes is pretty easy. Maybe asking for BRT
treatments or a complete street along Bayshore at this point makes the
entire request too big and more easily rejectable. Then we end up with
nothing more than their initial proposal.
2) The right of way that could be obtained by setting Home Depot back x
feet from their property line may be for naught if other properties
along
the street are built up to their property lines.
I whole heartedly support BRT. I think that is the way to go as rail is
too expensive and inflexible. I just don't know if this is the best
time
and place to ask for BRT style treatments or a complete rebuild of the
street.
A more discreet BRT type request could be for transit priority to be
incorporated into any new signals they install.
Mike
"Dan Krause"
Sent by: Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org
07/27/2005 11:59 AM
To
cc
transit1 at rescuemuni.org
Subject
RE: [Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
Hi Folks,
We need to be thinking about transit on this section of Bayshore as
well.
The heavily used #9 bus runs through here and is already slowed
significantly from traffic at certain times of the day. Rescue Muni
feels
that BRT is an appropriate treatment here. Many transit-dependent
people
rely on the #9 and without BRT improvements, there lives are going to
just
get much worse after Home Depot opens.
We should all sit down very soon and figure out if this can become a
"Complete Street". We must not preclude transit lanes here and it
would
be fabulous if Home Depot could pay for a complete streets treatment.
They
damn well should because it is going to be a cash cow for them and they
are going inundate the the street with traffic. The street width is
very
wide on Bayshore so it may work out for everybody. Home Depot needs to
be designed in a way that doesn't constrain the width of the road.
______________________________
Dan Krause
Managing Director, Rescue Muni
105 San Jose Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94110
415/826-1219 (p) 415/826-3362 (f)
dankrause at rescuemuni.org
www.rescuemuni.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org
[mailto:Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org] On Behalf Of Shannon
Dodge
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
Subject: [Carfreeliving] Re: Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
Thanks for that idea Mike. I work at Bernal Heights Neighborhood
Center,
so yes, am involved in this one. BTW, for anyone interested in going to
the Planning Commish tomorrow, the meeting does start at 1pm but this
item
is not scheduled until 6 pm -
http://www.sfgov.org/site/planning_page.asp?id=33460
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Carfreeliving digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway (Mike Sallaberry)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:15:14 -0700
From: Mike Sallaberry
Subject: [Carfreeliving] Home Depot and Bayshore Blvd bikeway
To: Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On this project, one possible mitigation for the traffic impacts of Home
Depot could be for them to pay for (or do the work for) the median
shaving
necessary to stripe a northbound bike lane on Bayshore from Industrial
to
Jerrold. DPT mentioned the idea to them but I believe they said their
project area was limited, or something like that. I think it would be a
good way for them to build up some goodwill with the community, and in
the
whole scheme of things, it will not cost them that much, especially
since
they are already doing some concrete/asphalt/signal work near the
entrance
on Bayshore. Too bad they didn't take the opportunity to be more
proactive.
The southbound route here is on Barneveld/Loomis, so for this section of
Bayshore, the median shaving and northbound bike lane would take care of
a
big chunk of what we need on Bayshore. With the Oakdale bike lanes
recently extended, this is a good chance to continue filling in the gaps
in the area.
Anyone involved with the Home Depot effort? I think if enough people ask
for this, there is a chance they'll do it.
Mike
** Thursday, July 28th **
BAYSHORE HOME DEPOT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
1 pm, City Hall, Rm 400*
The proposed Home Depot on Bayshore (site of the old Goodman's Lumber
and
Whole Earth Access) will have a dramatic impact on traffic and could
affect bike lanes on Bayshore. This Planning Commission meeting will be
the final review and action on the project -- be sure to come out and
help
push for the best outcome for biking on Bayshore.
_______________________________________________
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
To unsubscribe:
mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
or, for all options, go to:
http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/carfreeliving_livablecity.org/attachments/20050727/0cccf69e/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Carfreeliving
mailing list