[Carfreeliving] SPUR and Transportation Reform
Andrew Sullivan
andrew at sulli.org
Tue Mar 1 11:52:08 MST 2005
I don't work for SPUR.
On Mar 1, 2005, at 10:43, Steve Jones wrote:
> No, that you're flaking for downtown.
>
> Steven T. Jones
> City Editor
> San Francisco Bay Guardian
> (415) 487-2552
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:andrew at sulli.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:43 AM
> To: Steve Jones
> Cc: carfreeliving at livablecity.org; Joshua Hart
> Subject: Re: [Carfreeliving] SPUR and Transportation Reform
>
>
> That SPUR can do math?
>
> On Mar 1, 2005, at 10:42, Steve Jones wrote:
>
>> Why am I not surprised?
>>
>> Steven T. Jones
>> City Editor
>> San Francisco Bay Guardian
>> (415) 487-2552
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:andrew at sulli.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:34 AM
>> To: Joshua Hart
>> Cc: carfreeliving at livablecity.org
>> Subject: Re: [Carfreeliving] SPUR and Transportation Reform
>>
>>
>> I think SPUR was just being realistic about the budget. They support
>> alternative revenue sources for Muni (as does Rescue Muni, as do most
>> other alt-transportation types) but they also understood that with a
>> $57 million deficit there's no realistic way to make up the difference
>> without a fare hike this fiscal year. Longer term revenue sources
>> like
>> sales tax, parking tax, downtown assessment, vehicle environmental
>> impact fee, and congestion charging will NOT be implemented in time to
>> address this year's deficit, and there's no extra money in the General
>> Fund.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2005, at 10:29, Joshua Hart wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave and all-
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for setting up this valuable list. I have a question to
>>> pose-
>>> It seems like the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research
>>> Association has consistently been on the pro-car, pro-development,
>>> pro- downtown business, pro-wealth side of many issues lately.
>>> Their
>>> lonely stand in support of widening MLK in GG Park, and in support of
>>> yesterday's Muni fare increase clearly illustrates this bias.
>>>
>>> My question is- has SPUR always supported these policies? How have
>>> other pro-environment, pro-ped/ bike/ transit organizations dealt
>>> with
>>> this? (did SPUR's transportation committee actually vote to support a
>>> Muni fare hike?)
>>>
>>> Just wondering,
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Chappell, president of the nonprofit think tank San Francisco
>>> Planning and Urban Research Association, said Muni's three-pronged
>>> budget was fair and should lead to more efficient transit service.
>>>
>>> "The social and economic health of San Francisco depends on a strong
>>> Muni, '' he said. "Your proposed budget has everyone sharing the
>>> pain.
>>> That is correct."
>>>
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> | __o SF BICYCLE COALITION ___ __0
>>> |
>>> | _`\<,_ Promoting the Bike
>>> |___| _ \<,_ |
>>> | (*)/ (*) for Everyday Transport
>>> (*)+---(*)/ (*) |
>>> | |
>>> | 1095 Market St. #215 SF 94103 415.431.BIKE www.sfbike.org
>>> |
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Joshua Hart Program Director 415-431-2453 ext. 23 joshua at sfbike.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list to facilitate and promote
>>> car-free living in SF
>>> To unsubscribe:
>>> mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
>>> or, for all options, go to:
>>> http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
>> to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
>> To unsubscribe:
>> mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
>> or, for all options, go to:
>> http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
>>
>
More information about the Carfreeliving
mailing list