[Carfreeliving] South Van Ness ramp
Andrew Sullivan
sulli at sulli.org
Tue Nov 15 18:45:51 MST 2005
I wonder if the problem is that a 2 lane ramp would have safety issues merging with the 2 lane ramp from Octavia. Even so, it might make sense to restore the second lane at least around the ramp (merging before it hits the skyway), so the congestion is reduced on the street.
------- Original Message -------
On 11/16/2005 01:30 Mike Sallaberry wrote:
Ramp is Caltrans, Division/13th/Duboce/whatever it is there is a city
street but in Caltrans airspace. Ramp itself is apparently one lane now
when it used to be two...
Joshua Switzky/CTYPLN/SFGOV
11/15/2005 11:29 AM
To
Mike Sallaberry <Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org>
cc
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org, Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org
Subject
Re: [Carfreeliving] Fw: BoS Land Use -- Market/Octavia freeway ramp
hasn't it been two lanes for a long time prior to the construction? Also -
this isn't Caltrans' facility or jurisdiction, though, Division is a city
street, so I would think it's totally up to the City, not Caltrans (though
they might have striped/built the final street as part of the project).
-j
Mike Sallaberry <Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org>
Sent by: Carfreeliving-bounces at livablecity.org
11/14/2005 02:59 PM
To
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
cc
Subject
Re: [Carfreeliving] Fw: BoS Land Use -- Market/Octavia freeway ramp
I checked around with folks working on this project and they're working on
the signage, among a number of things. It's partially dependent on
whether or not Caltrans will add a second lane at the 13th/Duboce/S Van
Ness off-ramp. Right now it's apparently backed up badly with only one
lane on the on-ramp (it was two during the construction).
Mike
"Andrew Sullivan" <sulli at sulli.org>
11/03/2005 08:15 PM
Please respond to
andrew at sulli.org
To
Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org, Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
cc
Subject
RE: [Carfreeliving] Fw: BoS Land Use -- Market/Octavia freeway ramp
Guys,
I've said it before, I'll say it again (maybe to a different email list?).
BETTER SIGNAGE is needed for this to have any chance of working. The
tiny little baby-sized "FREEWAY ->" signs ARE NOT sufficient to make it
clear to out-of-towners how to get to 101 and 80!
If the city wants people not to take that turn, it should put up BIG signs
(i.e. 10' x 10', full sized highway signs) before Duboce: "101 South, 80
East -> / NO TURNS AT OCTAVIA". Also at Octavia, again a full sized sign
should say: "To 101 South, 80 East: Turn Right At Gough."
I know out-of-towners (ick!) should only go to the Wharf and all, but some
do come to the Castro and environs, and it would be awfully nice to
explain to them clearly how to get out of town.
(Of course, the preferred choice is to take BART and change to Muni at
Civic Center, but unless we have a car buyback program on upper Market,
this won't help the motorists already here.)
Andrew
------- Original Message -------
On 11/4/2005 03:35 Mike Sallaberry wrote:
Dave, you like the idea of funneling cyclists, many of whom are going
around 20mph, into a 4'-5' wide channel with raised sides that may
suddenly end up with a car across the end of it?
Such a median could not be designed to prevent right turning cars from
going onto the freeway. It would probably reduce the incidence of the
illegal turns, but it would concurrently decrease the ability of a cyclist
to avoid any cars that do turn.
That plus problems with debris gathering and not being swept up by regular
street cleaners, or the increased odds of cyclists striking a raised
island that they space on or don't look for/expect. This type of design
is also expressly prohibited by transportation design manuals. Not that I
always agree with these manuals, but I do in this case.
We can argue about this forever. The only way to find out who is right is
to actually build it, but you won't find me supporting it...or riding
through it. Maybe I'm completely wrong on this topic, but if I'm not, the
lesson is going to be learned by someone who may not be around to talk
about it afterwards.
On that melodramatic note...
Mike
----- Forwarded by Mike Sallaberry/DPT/SFGOV on 11/03/2005 06:17 PM -----
Dave Snyder <dave at livablecity.org>
11/03/2005 03:14 PM
To
Joshua Switzky <Joshua.Switzky at sfgov.org>, Mike Sallaberry
<Mike.Sallaberry at sfgov.org>
cc
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org
Subject
Re: [Carfreeliving] BoS Land Use -- Market/Octavia freeway ramp
Thanks, Josh, for this suggestion below:
>Intersection designs ... to make the right turn are
>not only totally possible, they have been discussed ... it would
>take a bit of
>reworking a curb and throwing in a very short median, extending into the
>crosswalk, between the bike lane and the righthand traffic lane.
This is an idea worth trying.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
To unsubscribe:
mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
or, for all options, go to:
http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
---------
Andrew Sullivan
** please respond to andrew at sulli.org**
Updated frequently! http://sulli.org
_______________________________________________
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
To unsubscribe:
mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
or, for all options, go to:
http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
_______________________________________________
Carfreeliving at livablecity.org mailing list
to facilitate and promote car-free living in SF
To unsubscribe: mailto:Carfreeliving-request at livablecity.org?subject=unsubscribe
or, for all options, go to:
http://livablecity.org/mailman/listinfo/carfreeliving_livablecity.org
---------
Andrew Sullivan
** please respond to andrew at sulli.org**
Updated frequently! http://sulli.org
More information about the Carfreeliving
mailing list